President Trump and his reelection marketing and marketing campaign occupy spent over $sixteen million on Facebook adverts, which lean on talk of a migrant “invasion.”

WASHINGTON – Several Republican lawmakers on Friday called on the Condo Ethics Committee to start out an investigation into Accept. Joaquin Castro after he tweeted the names and corporations of forty four Texans that donated to President Donald Trump’s marketing and marketing campaign. 

In a letter to Condo Ethics Committee Chairman Ted Deutch, D-Fla., and rating member Accept. Kenny Marchant, R-Texas, the lawmakers accused Castro of “violating Rule XXIII of the Code of Decent Habits for publicly posting the names and offices of individual donors to” Trump.

“Posting a aim checklist of private voters merely for supporting his political opponent is anithetical to our tips and serves to suppress the free speech and free affiliation rights of Americans,” the letter says.

Republicans Reps. Andy Biggs of Arizona, Matt Gaetz of Florida, Jody Hice of Georgia, Debbie Lesko of Arizona, Jeff Duncan of South Carolina, Randy Weber of Texas and Ted Budd of North Carolina all signed the letter.

Castro on Monday criticized forty four donors that donated essentially the most amount of $2,000 to Trump, all of which were from San Antonio, his fatherland and the district he represents.

More: El Paso gunman confessed to concentrated on Mexicans, police advise

He integrated a screenshot of the names of and their corporations in the tweet. The checklist is public listing and could even be found on-line on the Federal Elections Rate net site. He’s the twin brother of 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Julián Castro.

“Their contributions are fueling a marketing and marketing campaign of hate that labels Hispanic immigrants as ‘invaders,'” Joaquin Castro wrote in the tweet.


Within the wake of mass shootings in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio, President Trump is reportedly in talks with leaders on both side of the notify of rising background assessments for gun purchases.

Castro’s tweet got here two days after a mass shooting in El Paso, where a minimal of 22 other folks occupy died. The alleged shooter acknowledged he was concentrated on Mexicans, authorities acknowledged. The suspect was moreover linked to a “manifesto” that had anti-immigrant and anti-Latino ideologies. 

Trump criticized Castro’s tweet on Wednesday, hours after Trump visited El Paso to meet with first repsonders, sanatorium employees and victims and relatives of the shooting.

Castro’s congressional workplace called the claims from the GOP lawmakers “baseless.”

“Their letter is a disingenuous strive by pro-dark money, a ways-appropriate legislators to restrict Americans’ ability to trace money in politics. They’d like mammoth contributions to be kept secret so as that there’s no meaningful transparency in political giving,” acknowledged Castro’s spokeswoman Katherine Schneider. “We gape ahead to listening to from the Committee if the search records from is assumed to be.” 

The GOP lawmakers in the letter claimed that publishing a donor checklist acts “to suppress free speech and the first-rate of Americans to freely accomplice below the First Amendment is no longer a fresh idea.”

More: Trump: Congress discussing ‘meaningful’ gun background assessments, NRA will occupy enter

“By publishing a list of private voters who donated to his political opponent, Accept. Castro sought to support harassment against these voters merely on the foundation of their political affairs,” the letter continues. “It could probably no longer be quite argued that Accept. Castro had any other aim in posting that checklist and telling his activist followers that these contributors were inciting hate. Whether or no longer he intended to provoke bodily violence or merely verbal harassment, his intent was to take a seat down down aid the free speech and free affiliation rights of Americans.

“This habits can no longer be tolerated by a member of this establishment. Accept. Castro took an oath to present a decide to and defend the Constitution of the USA, but his actions support to decrease the constitutional rights of American voters,” the letter concludes. “The defeat of a political opponent can by no diagram account for sacrificing our values as a free nation.”

Like what you’re reading?: Download the USA TODAY app for extra

Learn or Fragment this listing: